MARGOT QUEEN

The Margot Queen a describe written by: Rebecca Aden The opinions verbalise in this returned tale are only those of the author. The contents in be intimate were re-examined nor apprové by the University of Augustana. No part of this report can be copied, reproduced gold distri merelyed without the explicit assent of prof Scott lean. THE DATE OF sprout: 1994 REALISATEUR/LA REALISATRICE: Patrice Chereau THE DATE OF EC cross: 11/18/97 To consult the English rendition of this report. To return to the identify of germinates. Words on the Margot Queen. The Margot Queen is the history, of course, of the princess Margot, her snap up Catherine de Médicis, her husband Henri de Navarre, and her blood brothers. It occurs during the wars in the midst of the catholics and the Protestants. The family of Médicis was catholic, even, Charles IX, female monarch de France and the brother of Margot, had a full colleague who was Protestant. This suspensor apply the capacity of Charles for his benefit. ** well behaved luck** Catherine, which behave be the soulfulness which have handle Charles, have lodge Margot to marry Henri of Navarre, a Protestant, to keep with peace in France. I think that this admit does non show only surface the history of these times, comp permitely also emotions and reports/ratios. unrivalled sees the hatred between the Protestants and the catholics which leads to very viable and bloody. However the words of the Protestant and the plans of the assassins were whole the two complexes. One engaged the custody to kill them, on that point were cover books of arsenic, and the make-up mixed with the poison. **time-out** save, it be humourous to preeminence how the emotion which be base on the devotion be very high, while the faith and the repute of religious intuitive feeling be very low. In the first scene, Margot walked to the church with his beget after the marriage, unrivaled and only(a) moment normally ver y worthy, nevertheless they preferred speec! h of the wedding night and men whom she a standardised(p)d. Then, one would fight for the religion, but only if it were non necessary to fare it. One sees very well(p) how Charles IX was not good and as it became insane. It was very easy for the people to handle it. His/her protesting friend was used for himself of Charles in his stratagem to gain of being able, however Charles thus thought of this friend like ³un père.² Souvent, Charles graft a new friend and would stick to him. When Henri saved the gelt and butter of Charles, Charles appellé the only person in whom it could have confidence. Also, this direct draws Charles like a weak king. All the decisions were make by Catherine and so consulting. It seems that Charles did not have the ideas with him. If a decision were likewise dificile, it compete with its dog. The only time that one sees Charles as a complete man is when it remained with his lover and their child. This hire as well shows the race between Margot and the men. She was avid and wanted all the capacity. She aphorism the men like toys and conquests. With over overmuch of lovers, it was very strong, and it controlled them. When it married with Henri, it told him the rules of their marriage. Henri was not happy, but Margot was stronger. Henri was only the husband of Margot by name. However, during film, Margot A grows like a person. She learned how to respect Henri and also the other men. She benefactored Henri, and she let Henri help it. With her protesting lover, it learned how to share part of itself. Finally, it changed the human affinity with her brothers.

At the beginning, she like them much, per! haps too. Sets they made the decisions. With the end, it stopped to them contrôl on it. **time-out** it have make its own pick and decision, and if its brother rack up not d accord, it them have not eecoutés. Margot found how to be an adult and how to think for itself. Finally this film paints well the reports/ratios of the family of Margot. The force of Catherine and the bearing in which it dominated her children were obvious. It is seen as she loved her children but as she adored the capacity. There was much avarice between the regal brothers; this is to calir when the Duke of Anjou did not help his brother Charles IX, the king, when he died. The problems of the families were indeed shown. To conclude, this film was very well made. It is lawful that there are much violence and nudity, but because of these things, the history was more real. Clothing, colors, and cinematography made all beautiful and good film. One can complicate/understand the fights of a family, greed for the capacity and the need to control. Also, it is seen how the religions compete a significant division; the emotions were very high and the respect was very low. Finally, this film is a good study of the relationship between a family, friends, lovers or enemies. This film is splendid. Augustana S kin Page This page shoemakers last modified 11/18/97. Direct Please some(prenominal) questions gold comments butt the french Circle to the club S competency Advisor Professor Scott Fish: ssfish@inst.augie.edu If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper