Not an Ayn Rand Essay

The fiction novel, The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand is found off of her philosophy of Objectivism. Ayn Rand defines and separates her philosophy of Objectivism into four different and distinct assorts. The foremost surgical incision Ayn Rand explains is Metaphysics. Metaphysics is an objective humankind where you only accept facts as public and non fantasies or desires. The next part of Objectivism is Epistemology, which is agreementing by perceiving reality by using knowledge or facts as your guide. The third part is Ethics and self-interest.The final part of Objectivism is laissez-faire capitalism, which is equal trade fleck the government acts as a police force only. The third part of Objectivism, Ethics and Self-Interest, is explained by Ayn Rand as Manevery manis an dying in himself, not the means to the ends of others. He must exist for his profess sake, neither sacrificing himself to others nor sacrificing others to himself. The pursuit of his possess rational self-in terest and of his stimulate gladness is the highest moral purpose of his life. Ayn Rand.This quote is outdo represented as individuation in Objectivism. Ayn Rands contain, The Fountainhead, comp atomic number 18s the ideals of individuals in society and shows how the laissez-faire(a)s act differently and, by the end, become identified and looked upon as good when they stick to their experience ideals. Howard Roark is created as the protagonist of The Fountainhead. Roark is as well as the vanquish representation of Ayn Rands philosophy, Objectivism. Lois put off is introduced into the book by asking Peter Keating to build an ugly house to her satisf swear out, tell Lets be gods.Lets be ugly ( repair, 241) . both(prenominal)(prenominal) Howard Roark and Lois Cook both make their profess pursuit for self-interest and to their deliver happiness as the highest moral purpose of their lives. steady though Lois Cook contri only whene be seen as an individual, her self-int erests corporation be seen as immoral, which can be concluded that Lois is not an Individualist, while Howard Roark is best fit as an individualist in the eyes of Ayn Rand. When we look into the story The Fountainhead, we encounter the characteristics that both Howard Roark and Lois Cook portray.When Ayn Rand wrote The Fountainhead, she intended to keep the syntax simple so readers could relieve oneself an understanding of Objectivism and individualism. We can clearly see that the protagonist, Howard Roark, is portrayed as an objectivist and individualist, who also rejects the worst of social standards, while Lois Cook is seen as a radical, who objects the best of social standards. When we go even further into The Fountainhead, we discover that Howard Roark loves his type of forward-looking design in architecture rather than referring to the older and more recognis commensurate types of architecture from history, such(prenominal) as Greek or Roman architecture.Because he prefer s to modernize his own designs, he is suspended from Stantons institute of engineering science and has been removed from several jobs. Roark was offered a job to build a mod bank, but he wont remove any of his own designs. The worst part about Howard Roarks out of luck fact is that his designs are brilliant. Even Peter Keating refers to Howard Roark in needs of assistance, because Howard Roarks designs are wonderful and unique to the eyes of slew.Even then, when Howard Roark isnt given credit for conception the buildings, credit was all given to Keating, who didnt have enough credence for himself to, at the least, attempt to create his own architectural designs. duration we sojourn to look at Howard Roark, we can see that while Ayn Rand created Howard Roark, he remain as his own without sacrificing or abandoning his own beliefs to gain himself a higher(prenominal) status in society, and Roark only pursues his own self-interests to bring himself to his highest moral purpos e.Howard Roark has his own individual goals that others would see as foolish and stupid, while he stayed as an individual with his own ideals and succeeded. These are what Ayn Rand would consider individualized, because Howard Roark attempts to make a change within society and has his own values, while society wishes to remain the aforementioned(prenominal) and put down others who dont follow what they believe in. Howard Roark seeks to create, not just his original designs and building, but also a sense of originality.Henry Cameron, Howard Roarks inspiration, once told him that unless he changed his ideals of architecture, he would never make it big in the business. Howard Roark denied what he said anyways, saying that he wishes to continue with his own work. Even when he got hired by Francon & Heyer, Howard Roark continued to stick with his own modernistic designs over conforming on older architectural designs. Howard Roark even do his own architecture and building firm which was built on his own modern beliefs and ideals. Further on in the book, Howard Roark continued to stay with his own ideals and beliefs when he went to court twice.During the first trial, he was sued for the construction of a building, which was plan by Ellsworth Toohey. Toohey did this so he could eliminate the innovative Howard Roark from the architect business, which was almost successful. Roark was found guilty and had to shut down his architect firm, but lock in had faith in his own ideals. The second trial was on the action of Howard Roark destroying the Cortlandt homes project, after his plans being changed. During the trial, Howard Roark made some statements about selfishness and about remain individual with oneself.Howard Roark goes on about people who create and how they suffer from the putridness of societies, which is in reference to Peter Keating when he asked Roark for help all of the multiplication Keating asked Roark for help on certain designs, which made Keating f amous. Howard Roark was later found not guilty and won the trial Howard Roark ended up marrying Dominique Francon after because he was confident with his own individual ideas while Peter Keating wasnt able to be individual. Howard Roark is definitely created as an individualist by Ayn Rand, because he prevails by means of all of the situations he encounters with his own ideals with him.Whether or not the outcomes for Howard Roark were good or bad, he never changed his ideals or beliefs in every situation, making him an individualist. While Howard Roark is fully known to be an individualist, Lois Cook has a sense of individualism, but is too radical and immoral to be classified as an individualist. As we look into The Fountainhead, Cook has shown herself against most of the social norms. Even though Howard Roark doesnt follow social standards, Lois Cook goes to the immoral naturals of denying good hygiene and conditions of liveliness areas.She doesnt think about the corrupt power o f higher government activity or any of the other enormously poor social problems. The reason that Ayn Rand shows her readers Lois Cook was to show a person who attempted individualism, but did not fully become individual. Lois Cook has characteristics like an individualist but isnt exactly one. Lois Cook wants to be someone original, different, an individual, but her ideals are extreme and immoral. Is it not very easy to argue that poor hygiene is a good idea. It also isnt easy to argue that anyone could enjoy indisposed designed buildings.It is pointed out obviously that Lois Cook is radically immoral and isnt an individual. Some capability suggest that Lois Cook is a person who creates. Others might argue that her nonconformity makes her and individualist still. But, her ideals could be best organized as nihilistic. Nihilism is a want to destroy and rejection of morals. Lois Cook could be best compared with Ellsworth Toohey, who also wanted to destroy peoples reputations, peopl e such as Howard Roark in the architectural business. Ayn Rand explained being individual also meant to have morals.Lois Cook didnt have many morals when she was introduced into the book for the utterly period of time, so she couldnt be classified as an individualist under the ideals of objectivism and individualism. Ayn Rand intentionally placed Lois Cook in The Fountainhead in order for the readers to see a difference of characteristics between Individualism and Lois Cook. We can conclude from this that Lois Cook was merely an example of how Individualism is misinterpreted by the minds of people who havent really thought about the ideals of individualism or beliefs of objectivism.In conclusion, Howard Roark is indeed an individualist, while Lois Cook is not an individualist. Howard Roark shows the qualities and characteristics that Ayn Rand defines as an individualist. While Lois Cook shows some characteristics of being an individualist, her nihilistic and immoral ideals show tha t she cannot be an individualist and will never be with her ideals if she continues to not accept facts that there are some social norms that are needed for mans survival and individualism.